Skip to main content
 
 
 

Who should be on the National DNA Database … and who is?

Who should be on the National DNA Database … and who is?

The Coalition Government has recently announced under its Protection of Freedoms bill that the DNA profiles of individuals who have not been convicted of any crime will be deleted from the National DNA Database (NDNAD) in order to comply with the December 2008 ruling of the European Court of Human Rights.  It is thought that there are over a million people on the database without a linked conviction.  Currently, therefore, we are in a situation where significant numbers of profiles and samples are held in contravention of the European judgment and undoubtedly there will be cases coming to court in which the intelligence on which the case has been brought will have been derived from an “illegally” held sample or profile.

The National DNA Database was set up by the Forensic Science Service in 1995 and was the first DNA intelligence database in the world.  It still is one of the largest, holding in excess of 5 million profiles, and is now in the custodianship of the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA).  As new profiles are loaded onto the database, they are automatically compared with the profiles held to establish if there is a match with any already stored.  Such a process can link individuals to crimes and crimes to crimes and as such has revolutionised intelligence-led policing in the last fifteen years.

Since its inception, legislation governing whose profile is held on the database has slowly evolved.  This has been controversial, with England and Wales becoming one of the few jurisdictions worldwide to allow for the permanent retention of a person’s profile, regardless of whether they were acquitted or, for example, the allegation against them was found to be malicious; it was seemingly impossible to get a profile removed.  Two individuals, “S” and Marper, took issue with the retention of their profiles and pursued a legal action against the British Government in the European Court of Human Rights.

In December 2008 the European Court handed down its ruling: it stated that the blanket retention of DNA profiles and fingerprints in cases where proceedings were dropped or an acquittal resulted was in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In May 2009 the Home Office issued a consultation document:  ‘Keeping the right people on the database: Science and public protection' and in November 2009 outlined proposals in an attempt to comply with the ruling whilst maintaining a balance between public protection and the rights of an individual to privacy.  The proposal for retention and disposal of samples is summarised in the following table:

DNA Profile Retention Proposals

Occurrence

Proposal

ADULT – Conviction – All Crimes

Indefinite

ADULT – Non Conviction – Any Crime

6 Years

UNDER 18s – Conviction – Serious Crime

Indefinite

UNDER 18s – Conviction – Minor Crime

1st  Conviction – 5 Years;
2nd Conviction – Indefinite

UNDER 18s – Non Conviction – Serious Crime

3 Years (6 Years for 16/17-year-olds)

UNDER 18s – Non Conviction – Minor Crime

3 Years

DNA Sample Retention Proposals

Occurrence

Proposal

All Cases

6 Months

As can be seen, the proposals were complex and have the potential to result in an inundation of requests from individuals for their DNA profiles to be removed from the Database and for samples to be removed from storage and destroyed.  The more recent proposal from the Coalition Government goes further, most notably requiring that a person’s profile cannot be retained if they have been acquitted of the minor offence for which it was collected.  It is uncertain what steps the NDNAD custodian has yet taken to ensure compliance with these proposals, if any.

In this current period, therefore, there will undoubtedly be cases coming to court in which the DNA intelligence will have been derived from a sample or profile held in contravention of the European ruling.  Whether courts in the UK will be willing to consider such arguments as a basis to reject DNA evidence remains to be seen.

Dr Helen Davey

Tweets by @KBCforensics 

Subscribe To Mailing List

To unsubscribe click here

What our customers say...

  • Really happy with all aspects of this case and would definitely recommend this company. Thank you.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Clear advice given at start and very prompt response.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • We have used KBC on many occasions in the past and have always had a reliable service.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Mr Brown was an impressive witness. As far as I am concerned, you can give him full marks all round.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Just a very high quality, professional service.

    Solicitor, December 2019
  • Value for money.

    Solicitor, May 2020
  • Good service, prompt, efficient, have used many times in the past.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Provided helpful information above and beyond what was expected.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • We were kept updated throughout the process and the report was provided promptly.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Very quick turnaround, with attention to detail and helpful comments.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • I was delighted by Mrs Tweedy's professional and thorough approach.

    Mr Saltrese - September 2019
  • Always try to instruct, if possible, due to excellent service provided.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • I was able to have a meaningful conversation with a specialist when obtaining a quote for the work.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • I will definitely use Dr Schudel in the future and will be recommending him to my colleagues.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Complete satisfaction with services.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • We have always received professional and high standards of services. Reports are produced promptly and communications responded to without delay.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Karl Ebejer was always prompt with responses and was very helpful.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • We have used your company numerous times and have always received very well written and easy to understand reports.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • I have instructed you for many years and always find yourselves to be helpful, efficient and reports are prepared in an easy to digest format.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • I have been instructing KBC for over 15 years and have always been happy with the service, contact from experts and quality of the reports.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Excellent client care and service.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Mr Dampier made an incredibly complicated matter easy to understand.

    Barrister, February 2020
  • Experts are always happy to discuss matters prior to providing report.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Mr Ebejer was always very professional and friendly.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Always a pleasure working with you guys; our first choice for instruction.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Mr Beatson was very helpful and professional, clearly with a wide range of knowledge and understanding.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • Mrs Allan was most informative and provided explanations where required. A very professional attitude.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • Mr Dunnill’s report was helpful and our conference at Court informative; I would certainly be happy to use him in a case again.

    Barrister, December 2020
  • I have worked with Mr Donnelly in many cases over the years and his expertise, presentation of written work and ability in the witness box is second to none.

    Counsel, November 2020
  • Excellent reports within Legal Aid rates.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • I don’t think the service could be improved upon or bettered in any way.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Courteous and informative.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • I was told you were the best at what you did. I honestly believe I got what was required.

    Private client, July 2020
  • Quick and efficient; and well laid out report.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Very fast, professional, easy to instruct.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Report well presented. Concise and precise.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Quick, professional, friendly, comprehensive.

    Prison Governor, June 2020
  • I found the service to be very professional throughout.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • There is no question that your input was instrumental in persuading the Defendants to alter their stance.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Provided quotes quickly and complied with court timescales.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Fast response and work turnover time; great customer service.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Knowledgeable, helpful and polite.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • Easy access to experts; excellent communication and advice, as required.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Very approachable.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Jenny Gray was excellent and very helpful throughout.

    Barrister, November 2019
  • Brilliant communication, my emails were promptly answered.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • We have used your services for some time and are very satisfied.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Would definitely use you again; very impressed.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Easy to contact, quick responses (particularly in the current circumstances), very helpful staff.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Prompt attention to dealing with queries and providing information and reports.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • Website was very informative.  First contact was knowledgeable and efficient. The report was delivered in record time - very impressed!

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Excellent, as usual.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Andrew Dampier provided first class service in the form of reports and maps. He was able to explain the report in good layman’s terms and was also available to take calls and provide further information to counsel.

    Barrister, January 2021
  • I am extremely grateful to you for all your work on this case, in particular your prompt and helpful responses to my repeated requests.

    Barrister, February 2021
  • Swift service.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • Quick, expert and accurate.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Thank you very much once again for your excellent service.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Your (cell site) reports and maps were extremely helpful.

    Barrister, February 2021 ​​​​​​
  • Always provide detailed quotes to assist with applying for authority from LAA. Quick response and good communication.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Thank you for your hard work in this case and for the prompt responses. 

    Barrister, March 2020
  • Telephone communications were very helpful when we were not able to contact the expert directly. The call takers were knowledgeable as to the case and what was required and answered any queries we had.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • I used Andrew Dampier for a cell site case and he was exceptional.

    Barrister, November 2020
  • Easy to use BAC calculation form, fast turn around.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Thank you very much, I am grateful and impressed with your service.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Simon Bunter is extraordinarily knowledgeable, remarkably efficient and a wonderful communicator. I cannot recommend him highly enough.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Very quick response to queries raised following receipt of report. Very helpful.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Extremely helpful, efficient and above all thoroughly professional.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Prompt provision of report and prompt reply to queries.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Mr Armstrong impressed throughout the trial as a real expert in his field. It was apparent too that Mr Armstrong was entirely impartial.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Quick, efficient service and a well-prepared report.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Exceptionally efficient service.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Mr Prime reported to us with great efficiency and presented his evidence to the Jury in an extremely persuasive manner.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Speedy responses to our instructions and questions asked. Helpful estimated timeframe for the service of reports.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Service was excellent throughout.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • There are times when DNA evidence can be a little dry, but Mike Appleby's presentation and delivery to the jury was pitch perfect.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • I am very impressed by your service.

    Solicitor, February 2020
  • I find KBC invariably helpful and reliable.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Simon Bunter is as good an expert as I have ever worked with.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Overall helpful and efficient service.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Mr Frost has been a great help in this case and we really appreciate his assistance.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Jenny Gray acted with the utmost integrity throughout. This was noted in open court by the judge hearing the case.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • I can say that I am very satisfied with the service I have received from KBC, starting with my initial phone call and interaction your colleague when I made my initial enquiry, right up to the report being received. I would certainly use KBC again and would recommend you to my colleagues.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Fast service; timely response to communication.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Prompt and Professional and produces excellent reports.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Mike Appleby's exceptional quality was noted by all of the Counsel involved in the case. It is always a pleasure to watch someone, who is good at something, doing it and doing it well.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • A thorough analysis, with well set out conclusions.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Regular contact, advice on hand via phone if necessary, prompt and efficient.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Found the service to be extremely helpful, given the timeframe in which the report was required.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • My impression of your service was excellent.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Extremely good customer service and continuous contact/support.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • I chose this company, as the first point of contact was extremely helpful.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Speedy and detailed quotes which do not delay funding from LAA.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • No question was too silly and everything was explained so clearly and easily; great customer service.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Communication and speed of delivery of information was, as always, excellent.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • We have used your services on many previous occasions. You always provide the cheapest estimate and respond quicker than any other service provider we have contacted for the purposes of Legal Aid.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Mr Appleby was truly excellent. While giving evidence it was plain that he has achieved the perfect blend of clarity and authoritative charisma.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • I have had the pleasure of the assistance of Mike Appleby on a number of occasions now and he is an excellent man to have around. 

    Counsel, March 2020

Keith Borer Consultants is a division of Orchid Cellmark Ltd, a company registered in England at 16 Blacklands Way, Abingdon, OX14 1DY.

Registered No. 4045527; VAT registration No. GB 750 0292 64

Website developed by Problue Solutions