Skip to main content
 
 
 

What is EncroChat?

What is EncroChat?

What is Encrochat - Dr David Schudel explains what it is, what legal challenges can be made and what the future holds

EncroChat dates to 2015 and is a Dutch company with at least one of its servers based in France. In early 2020, the EncroChat system was infiltrated by the National Gendarmerie and in March 2020 they started to investigate the messages jointly with the Dutch Police. This investigation continued until June 2020 when EncroChat issued a message to its users to say the system had been compromised.

It is not known exactly how the French authorities did infiltrate the system and how users/messages were prioritised or how much data was obtained. It is also not known if all messages were gathered or whether the data was subject to any filtering system prior to the data being forwarded to the relevant law enforcement agency. Within the UK, this was the National Crime Agency and the data was collated under “Operation Venetic”. A recent theory is that French authorities managed to infiltrate the system through an update that was issued by EncroChat in April 2021. This allowed them to receive the messages directly from the phones unencrypted. Prosecution experts have agreed that this theory is possible.

How does an EncroChat handset work?

EncroChat predominantly used BQ Aquaris (Android) handsets with the EncroChat operating system (OS) preloaded. The handsets had the microphone, camera and GPS settings disabled or removed for privacy reasons. The handset operated a dual boot system which was designed to hide the illicit operating system. Access to the EncroChat operating system was gained by powering the unit on and holding the volume button. If started normally, the phone would appear to be running as a normal handset.

What information is available to UK law enforcement?

The EncroChat handsets used a KPN (Dutch network) SIM card that could roam onto the British networks; the EncroChat operating system required mobile data to work and the SIM cards only utilised Mobile Data Events (MDE, also called GPRS) within the UK. Therefore, the only billing available to UK law enforcement was mobile data. Once a handset was identified, it was possible to then request the associated Mobile Data Events (GPRS) records from each of the 4 main UK networks.

How do EncroChat users connect with each other?

No conventional mobile telephone number was allocated to the EncroChat user and users communicated between each other using a “Handle/Username” and invited each other to connect in a similar way as traditional applications like “WhatsApp”.

How do police identify EncroChat users?

Due to there being no traditional user or subscriber details, the EncroChat users are often identified by co-locating the handset with conventional phones being operated by the EncroChat user or through co-location of the EncroChat handset with the user’s vehicles through ANPR or vehicle tracking data. Sometimes, location data made available from the EncroChat itself.

What legal challenges can be made in EncroChat cases?

Initially, there were questions on how the data had been obtained and the legality under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. The main question around this was:

  1. Were the communications intercepted whilst they were being transmitted or whilst they were being stored in or by the system?

The Court of Appeal set out that it was the latter, subject to some subsidiary arguments, and the evidence was deemed to be admissible.

A recent case in Sweden, where a man had been convicted of unlawful firearm possession, has been overturned by the Swedish Courts. It appears that this case relied heavily on the EncroChat messages.

Within the UK, law enforcement agencies have used the data for initial intelligence gathering to formulate other tactics, such as surveillance and the execution of search warrants, thereby obtaining other, more tangible, evidence.

In some cases, though, the evidence is still primarily based on the use of the EncroChat device and the comparison of the call data obtained from the British networks against known or accepted phones and also the use of ANPR data or vehicle tracking data to suggest that the user of the EncroChat phone was the same person as the user of the conventional accepted phone or vehicle.

EncroChat only used GPRS data, which must be analysed differently from conventional call data records. GPRS call data records do not provide a definitive time stamp but instead record a data session and the phone could have utilised the recorded cell at any point within that session. How this recorded session time is generated differs from network to network. On occasion, the session time can be up to several hours in duration and, if not compared correctly against the call data records for an accepted phone or ANPR data, could lead to the misinterpretation of the data.

What is the future for EncroChat?

On 12th June 2020, EncroChat sent all its users a message stating that government entities had seized its domain and that all users should power off their devices and physically dispose of them. EncroChat has not operated since this message was sent.

Do you have an EncroChat case?

If you a dealing with an EncroChat case and have any questions or concerns, please get in touch by email or phone with one of our four cell site experts at Keith Borer Consultants, namely Steve (Jack) Frost, Chris Walsh, David Schudel or Thomas Marryat, to see how we may be able to assist.

Dr David Schudel, Keith Borer Consultants

Tweets by @KBCforensics 

Subscribe To Mailing List

To unsubscribe click here

What our customers say...

  • Thank you very much, I am grateful and impressed with your service.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • My impression of your service was excellent.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Quick, professional, friendly, comprehensive.

    Prison Governor, June 2020
  • Really happy with all aspects of this case and would definitely recommend this company. Thank you.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Your (cell site) reports and maps were extremely helpful.

    Barrister, February 2021 ​​​​​​
  • Fast service; timely response to communication.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Thank you for your hard work in this case and for the prompt responses. 

    Barrister, March 2020
  • Courteous and informative.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Andrew Dampier provided first class service in the form of reports and maps. He was able to explain the report in good layman’s terms and was also available to take calls and provide further information to counsel.

    Barrister, January 2021
  • Quick, expert and accurate.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Good communication, fast quote and service of drink drive report.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Experts are always happy to discuss matters prior to providing report.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • I find KBC invariably helpful and reliable.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Excellent, as usual.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Always provide detailed quotes to assist with applying for authority from LAA. Quick response and good communication.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Easy to contact, quick responses (particularly in the current circumstances), very helpful staff.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • I am impressed by the efficiency and quality of the computer forensic reports. You are always my first port of call.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Extremely helpful, efficient and above all thoroughly professional.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Nigel Cook was incredibly thorough, professional and responded to my emails/questions very promptly.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Found the service to be extremely helpful, given the timeframe in which the report was required.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Mr Frost has been a great help in this case and we really appreciate his assistance.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Past experience has taught us that KBC is the go-to expert witness service.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • I have worked with Mr Donnelly in many cases over the years and his expertise, presentation of written work and ability in the witness box is second to none.

    Counsel, November 2020
  • I can say that I am very satisfied with the service I have received from KBC, starting with my initial phone call and interaction your colleague when I made my initial enquiry, right up to the report being received. I would certainly use KBC again and would recommend you to my colleagues.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Mrs Morley was very good and a strong defence witness.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Website was very informative.  First contact was knowledgeable and efficient. The report was delivered in record time - very impressed!

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Quick, efficient service and a well-prepared report.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Simon Bunter was excellent in evidence and dealt with the cross examination very well. He was adept at handling the questions and was professional in his delivery. He was well prepared and thorough.

    Barrister, May 2021
  • Exceptionally efficient service.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Mr Ebejer was always very professional and friendly.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Communication and speed of delivery of information was, as always, excellent.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • I am very impressed by your service.

    Solicitor, February 2020
  • Prompt attention to dealing with queries and providing information and reports.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • A thorough analysis, with well set out conclusions.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Value for money.

    Solicitor, May 2020
  • Good service, prompt, efficient, have used many times in the past.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Prompt responses, excellent handwriting experts.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Easy access to experts; excellent communication and advice, as required.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Mrs Allan was most informative and provided explanations where required. A very professional attitude.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • I will definitely use Dr Schudel in the future and will be recommending him to my colleagues.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • I always choose you because of the fast, efficient and excellent work you do.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • We have used your company numerous times and have always received very well written and easy to understand reports.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Excellent client care and service.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Very quick turnaround, with attention to detail and helpful comments.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Prompt and Professional and produces excellent reports.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • I chose this company, as the first point of contact was extremely helpful.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Service was excellent throughout.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Speedy and detailed quotes which do not delay funding from LAA.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • I don’t think the service could be improved upon or bettered in any way.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Mr Armstrong impressed throughout the trial as a real expert in his field. It was apparent too that Mr Armstrong was entirely impartial.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • I chose KBC because it has a good reputation and the price is very fair.

    Private client, April 2021
  • Mr Prime was very good at court in explaining concepts to the jury and presenting his evidence. I would have no hesitation in using him again and recommending him to others.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Our lawyer is most impressed with your report.

    Instructing party, Guyana, April 2021
  • Very approachable.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Mr Appleby’s DNA report and the way in which he broke complex issues down was very much appreciated and greatly assisted in my cross-examination. I would have no hesitation in seeking his expert guidance again in the future.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • I have had the pleasure of the assistance of Mike Appleby on a number of occasions now and he is an excellent man to have around. 

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Karl Ebejer was always prompt with responses and was very helpful.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Good admin - chasing up correspondence. Quick preparation of report. Easy access to expert for clarification purposes.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Friendly, approachable, amenable, accommodating, professional.

    Instructing party, April 2021
  • No question was too silly and everything was explained so clearly and easily; great customer service.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Regular contact, advice on hand via phone if necessary, prompt and efficient.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Speedy responses to our instructions and questions asked. Helpful estimated timeframe for the service of reports.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Mr Dampier made an incredibly complicated matter easy to understand.

    Barrister, February 2020
  • We have always received professional and high standards of services. Reports are produced promptly and communications responded to without delay.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • There is no question that your input was instrumental in persuading the Defendants to alter their stance.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Thank you very much once again for your excellent service.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Provided quotes quickly and complied with court timescales.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Knowledgeable, helpful and polite.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • Swift service.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • Provided very comprehensive response to initial fire investigation enquiry, which guided what we needed.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Mr Dunnill’s report was helpful and our conference at Court informative; I would certainly be happy to use him in a case again.

    Barrister, December 2020
  • Brilliant communication, my emails were promptly answered.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • We have used your services on many previous occasions. You always provide the cheapest estimate and respond quicker than any other service provider we have contacted for the purposes of Legal Aid.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Clear advice given at start and very prompt response.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • I was able to have a meaningful conversation with a specialist when obtaining a quote for the work.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • Provided helpful information above and beyond what was expected.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Excellent DNA knowledge. Good turn around speed and communication.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • We were kept updated throughout the process and the report was provided promptly.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Mr Fagan was readily available to answer queries very promptly and worked to a tight time limit. He was also extremely helpful in trying circumstances surrounding a refusal by the prosecution to release exhibits.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Mr Prime reported to us with great efficiency and presented his evidence to the Jury in an extremely persuasive manner.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Judge gave favourable comments on Dr Ash's balanced approach.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • I used Andrew Dampier for a cell site case and he was exceptional.

    Barrister, November 2020
  • Very impressed; would use again.

    Barrister, April 2021
  • We have used KBC on many occasions in the past and have always had a reliable service.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • I find your service prompt, efficient and helpful. Alan was particularly helpful and rang me to discuss issues. I was able to understand clearly what he was outlining and think he will be an asset to the defence case.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Mr Brown was very good, he explained all the relevant toxicology issues, which can be complicated, and also explained them to the Court.

    Solicitor, June 2021
  • Very quick response to queries raised following receipt of report. Very helpful.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Fast response and work turnover time; great customer service.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • I am extremely grateful to you for all your work on this case, in particular your prompt and helpful responses to my repeated requests.

    Barrister, February 2021
  • I was told you were the best at what you did. I honestly believe I got what was required.

    Private client, July 2020
  • Report well presented. Concise and precise.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Telephone communications were very helpful when we were not able to contact the expert directly. The call takers were knowledgeable as to the case and what was required and answered any queries we had.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Would definitely use you again; very impressed.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Mr Brown was an impressive witness. As far as I am concerned, you can give him full marks all round.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Mr Beatson was very helpful and professional, clearly with a wide range of knowledge and understanding.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • I have been instructing KBC for over 15 years and have always been happy with the service, contact from experts and quality of the reports.

    Solicitor, December 2020

Keith Borer Consultants is a division of Orchid Cellmark Ltd, a company registered in England at 16 Blacklands Way, Abingdon, OX14 1DY.

Registered No. 4045527; VAT registration No. GB 750 0292 64

Website developed by Problue Solutions