Skip to main content
 
 
 

Sexual offences – ‘consent or not’ and the case for forensic examinations

Sexual offences – ‘consent or not’ and the case for forensic examinations

Sexual offences – ‘consent or not’ and the case for forensic examinations

Consent, or the absence of consent, is frequently the key issue in sexual offences.  In these austere times, however, the prosecution forensic case is often only that the defendant’s DNA was recovered from a swab; intended to confirm no more than that the alleged sexual act occurred, even in cases where that is not in dispute.  This is usually disclosed as an SFR stage 1 report with no indication of the underlying evidential value placed and frequently misses the opportunity to ensure justice is achieved first time round.

Justice is clearly not served when the ‘evidence’ is effectively confined to just one person’s word against another’s, with the jury left to decide whom they believe.  There are often two quite different descriptions of what took place.  Forensic strategy should be focussed on those differences to enable the credibility of either account to be tested.  This can often be through simple and inexpensive forensic examination of clothing for damages, or detection of different types of body fluid where there are differences in the types of sexual activity suggested (.e.g. where vaginal sex may or may not have been preceded by oral sex).  The examples which follow illustrate where forensic investigation of the circumstances surrounding an allegation of rape or sexual assault provided discriminating evidence.

Social Media and Mobile Phones

The material on social media such as Facebook is increasingly being used to shed light on the relationship of the parties’ pre and post offence, or, effectively, as character references for either party.  The disadvantage here, is that these sites are remote and the data on them may no longer be available by the time of the investigation, or cannot be captured and fixed at a specific historic moment in time.  An advantage of examining these sites is that, where the evidence trail can be followed, frequently the results are highly significant.

In one case, we examined the internet communications between a husband and wife, only to initially find that the settings on the husband’s laptop meant that such data had not been stored.  Fortunately his wife had used the same laptop to synchronise her iPhone, which caused all data to be backed up automatically.  The laptop therefore contained in the iPhone backup, a snapshot of the phone at that time.   Much of that data had been subsequently deleted from the phone, but from the backup on the laptop we were able to recover thousands of text messages which provided an accurate picture of the relationship, in a form that could be easily presented to the Court.

Quite often we find that data from a complainant’s mobile phone is recovered in a simple manner for presentation in a prosecution statement, with the phone returned immediately to the complainant making it unavailable for further and more detailed examination by the defence.  By contrast, the defendant’s mobile phone is frequently seized but not examined.  The tools for recovering data from deleted messages are continuing to develop, bringing down the cost of this type of examination the results of which can be critical to a defence.  Data from mobile phones really can assist juries in their assessment of whose account might be closer to the truth.

Damaged Clothing

We have also seen many cases where the examination of damage to clothing has been significant, and has on occasions been decisive.  These cases rely on careful observation, combined with experimental testing and precise evaluation of the results against what would be expected from each account of events.  We have been able to identify tears that were initiated by a cut, for example, or distinguish general wear degradation from a single act of force.  We recommend a check of the exhibits seized in the unused case material as it is increasingly common for this ‘evidence’ not to form part of the prosecution’s SFR Stage 1 reporting of a sexual offence.  Damaged clothing examinations can be a simple form of forensic observation with considerable evidential power when applied using the evaluation guidance enshrined in several Court of Appeal judgements.  From our perspective, given the often expressed concern about the low conviction rates for sexual offences, it is difficult to understand why apparent damage to clothing is so often overlooked by prosecution and defence lawyers.

Examination & Testing of Exhibits that are not part of the Prosecution case

Our laboratory facilities in Durham were put to good use in a case in which a defendant requested that a sleeping bag be examined for body fluid stains, as his account was that consensual sexual activity occurred on the sleeping bag.  The police had previously refused to commission any forensic work on the bag as any findings would not have had potential to support the complainant’s account that the sexual assault had taken place in another room.  We examined the sleeping bag and recovered samples for DNA profiling.  As a UKAS ISO17025 accredited testing laboratory, the DNA profiling we carry out meets the requirements of this exacting and internationally recognised standard.  As has occurred in many previous cases of this type, our examinations and the results of the DNA profiling proved to be consistent with the defendant’s account and inconsistent with the complainant’s.  This was an early example of a disturbing recent trend, by which Police refuse to sanction forensic examinations of exhibits which only have potential to support a defendant’s account.  Indeed, over a couple of years, it has become almost entirely the responsibility of the defence to commission forensic examinations relevant to a defendant’s account of events.

Consent or Not?

Forensic examination cannot directly establish whether or not consent was given, but equally it is wrong for investigators and lawyers to conclude that forensic examination cannot assist, simply because the main issue appears to be one of consent.  It remains surprising how many cases in which it is not disputed that sexual intercourse took place, still see the police authorise DNA profiling of the intimate swabs, in circumstances where the results can have no evidential value.  Properly applied forensic examination should focus on contacts and actions, specifically the differences in the activity described in the disputed accounts.  In our current experience, in recessionary times, this consideration is often incomplete or completely missing from the prosecution of sexual offences.

These three examples illustrate that appropriate forensic examination and analysis in some sexual assault and rape cases can be of significant benefit to the preparation of these cases and to the Courts.

Dr Duncan Woods

June 2014

Tweets by @KBCforensics 

Subscribe To Mailing List

To unsubscribe click here

What our customers say...

  • Helpfulness from always timely, pleasant and helpful first contact to conclusion of case.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • Service was excellent throughout.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Good service, prompt, efficient, have used many times in the past.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Value for money.

    Solicitor, May 2020
  • Mr Appleby’s DNA report and the way in which he broke complex issues down was very much appreciated and greatly assisted in my cross-examination. I would have no hesitation in seeking his expert guidance again in the future.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Speedy and detailed quotes which do not delay funding from LAA.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Would definitely use you again; very impressed.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Nigel Cook was incredibly thorough, professional and responded to my emails/questions very promptly.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Your (cell site) reports and maps were extremely helpful.

    Barrister, February 2021 ​​​​​​
  • Quick response with quote and report.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Ross Donnelly has been so helpful and professional at all times. We haven’t enough positive things to say about him.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • Quick and easy service. Clear and concise statement provided by the expert.

    Private instruction, September 2021
  • Speedy quotes and timely delivery of reports.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Prompt responses, excellent handwriting experts.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Always provide detailed quotes to assist with applying for authority from LAA. Quick response and good communication.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Excellent, as usual.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • I chose this company, as the first point of contact was extremely helpful.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • I have been instructing KBC for over 15 years and have always been happy with the service, contact from experts and quality of the reports.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Prompt and Professional and produces excellent reports.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Quick, expert and accurate.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Quick, efficient service and a well-prepared report.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Very impressed; would use again.

    Barrister, April 2021
  • Reliable, professional & very helpful. Helen Davey is a class act

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Telephone communications were very helpful when we were not able to contact the expert directly. The call takers were knowledgeable as to the case and what was required and answered any queries we had.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Quick, professional, friendly, comprehensive.

    Prison Governor, June 2020
  • Courteous and informative.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • I was able to have a meaningful conversation with a specialist when obtaining a quote for the work.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • Provided quotes quickly and complied with court timescales.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Mrs Allan was most informative and provided explanations where required. A very professional attitude.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • We have always received professional and high standards of services. Reports are produced promptly and communications responded to without delay.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Recently listened to a podcast of one of the experts and was impressed with content.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • Brilliant communication, my emails were promptly answered.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Many thanks for the report which is excellent.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Friendly, approachable, amenable, accommodating, professional.

    Instructing party, April 2021
  • Past experience has taught us that KBC is the go-to expert witness service.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • I don’t think the service could be improved upon or bettered in any way.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Exceptionally efficient service.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Mr Brown was very good, he explained all the relevant toxicology issues, which can be complicated, and also explained them to the Court.

    Solicitor, June 2021
  • I am impressed by the efficiency and quality of the computer forensic reports. You are always my first port of call.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Mr Prime was very good at court in explaining concepts to the jury and presenting his evidence. I would have no hesitation in using him again and recommending him to others.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Reliable and excellent communication to ensure that the work requested can be undertaken and processed efficiently.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Gregg Beatson was professional, knowledgeable and gave his opinion well.

    Counsel, June 2021
  • No question was too silly and everything was explained so clearly and easily; great customer service.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Regular contact, advice on hand via phone if necessary, prompt and efficient.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Clear advice given at start and very prompt response.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • Really happy with all aspects of this case and would definitely recommend this company. Thank you.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Easy access to experts; excellent communication and advice, as required.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • I have worked with Mr Donnelly in many cases over the years and his expertise, presentation of written work and ability in the witness box is second to none.

    Counsel, November 2020
  • Thank you very much once again for your excellent service.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Speedy responses to our instructions and questions asked. Helpful estimated timeframe for the service of reports.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Karl Ebejer was always prompt with responses and was very helpful.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Provided very comprehensive response to initial fire investigation enquiry, which guided what we needed.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Judge gave favourable comments on Dr Ash's balanced approach.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Website was very informative.  First contact was knowledgeable and efficient. The report was delivered in record time - very impressed!

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Fast response and work turnover time; great customer service.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Communication and speed of delivery of information was, as always, excellent.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Simon Bunter was excellent in evidence and dealt with the cross examination very well. He was adept at handling the questions and was professional in his delivery. He was well prepared and thorough.

    Barrister, May 2021
  • A thorough analysis, with well set out conclusions.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Mr Frost has been a great help in this case and we really appreciate his assistance.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Mr Fagan was readily available to answer queries very promptly and worked to a tight time limit. He was also extremely helpful in trying circumstances surrounding a refusal by the prosecution to release exhibits.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • We have used your services on many previous occasions. You always provide the cheapest estimate and respond quicker than any other service provider we have contacted for the purposes of Legal Aid.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Excellent DNA knowledge. Good turn around speed and communication.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • I find KBC invariably helpful and reliable.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Superlative quality of experts and understanding of the particular challenges facing solicitors’ firms.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • I always choose you because of the fast, efficient and excellent work you do.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Extremely helpful, efficient and above all thoroughly professional.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Experts are always happy to discuss matters prior to providing report.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Easy to contact, quick responses (particularly in the current circumstances), very helpful staff.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Excellent client care and service.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • I chose KBC because it has a good reputation and the price is very fair.

    Private client, April 2021
  • Andrew Dampier provided first class service in the form of reports and maps. He was able to explain the report in good layman’s terms and was also available to take calls and provide further information to counsel.

    Barrister, January 2021
  • Swift and timely report – kept in touch throughout the process – happy to discuss the matter further over the phone.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Good admin - chasing up correspondence. Quick preparation of report. Easy access to expert for clarification purposes.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Good communication, fast quote and service of drink drive report.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Very quick response to queries raised following receipt of report. Very helpful.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • My impression of your service was excellent.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Thank you very much, I am grateful and impressed with your service.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • I am extremely grateful to you for all your work on this case, in particular your prompt and helpful responses to my repeated requests.

    Barrister, February 2021
  • Mr Dunnill’s report was helpful and our conference at Court informative; I would certainly be happy to use him in a case again.

    Barrister, December 2020
  • We have used KBC on many occasions in the past and have always had a reliable service.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Very approachable.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Please pass on my thanks to Ross Donnelly for everything - top job!

    Counsel, July 2021
  • Report well presented. Concise and precise.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • There is no question that your input was instrumental in persuading the Defendants to alter their stance.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Mr Ebejer was always very professional and friendly.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Mrs Morley was very good and a strong defence witness.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Our lawyer is most impressed with your report.

    Instructing party, Guyana, April 2021
  • Great communication, very informative and quick turnaround.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • I find your service prompt, efficient and helpful. Alan was particularly helpful and rang me to discuss issues. I was able to understand clearly what he was outlining and think he will be an asset to the defence case.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • I was told you were the best at what you did. I honestly believe I got what was required.

    Private client, July 2020
  • Provided helpful information above and beyond what was expected.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Extremely efficient in all respects.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • We have used your company numerous times and have always received very well written and easy to understand reports.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Knowledgeable, helpful and polite.

    Solicitor, June 2020

Keith Borer Consultants is a division of Orchid Cellmark Ltd, a company registered in England at 16 Blacklands Way, Abingdon, OX14 1DY.

Registered No. 4045527; VAT registration No. GB 750 0292 64

Website developed by Problue Solutions