Skip to main content
 
 
 

Perception Response Time

Perception Response Time

Perception response time (PRT) is commonly known as reaction time and can be defined as the time that elapses from the instant that the driver recognises the existence of a hazard in the road, to the instant that the driver takes appropriate action, for instance, applying the brakes.  The response time can be broken down into four separate components; detection, identification, decision and response.

Driver reaction times first appeared in the Highway Code in its 3rd edition 1947.

 Highway Code 1947 Braking Distances

In that edition it appeared on the inside of the back cover and suggested that a vehicle would travel 1 foot for every mile per hour that the vehicle was travelling, while the driver reacted (‘thinking distance’).  

Since then the same distances, albeit now in metric units, have appeared in each edition up to and including the current 2007 15th edition. 

It is worth noting that even with the introduction of modern braking systems and better tyres that the stopping distances have not changed.  

Maybe it is time the Highway Code was updated to reflect the stopping capabilities of the modern motorcar and the research that is now available relating to perception response times.

There has been a great deal of research in an attempt to establish a Perception Response Time (PRT), however, to date there have been only a limited number of studies that reflect the circumstances/hazards presented to drivers in a real-world situation. 

Most research has taken place with volunteers on the road or in simulators in situations where they were aware that they were being tested and knew what their response had to be, i.e. push a button or tap the brake pedal.  These tests produced stopping times/distances close to those in the Highway Code.

Accident Reconstructionists tend to cite research carried out by Olson (Driver Perception Response Times; Olson, P.L. Society of Automotive Engineers, 1989) who suggests a time of between 0.75 and 1.5 seconds, with 85% of the sample responding in 1.5 seconds.

This figure of 1.5 seconds appears time and time again in reports without any explanation of how it was obtained or any consideration of the circumstances or complexities of the particular accident that is under investigation.

Marc Green, in an article [Perception-Reaction Time: Is Olson & Sivak All You Need To Know? published in Collision, (2009), 4, 88-95], is critical of Olson’s research, highlighting the ‘actual study reveals that the methodology was biased to produce short PRTs (perception/response times)’.

In 1981 Heikki Summala tested un-expectant drivers and produced the paper, “Driver/Vehicle Steering Response Latencies” in which he states:

A steering manoeuvre was induced among unaltered drivers by the sudden opening of the door of a car parked near the path of travel, lateral displacement of 1326 cars was measured unobtrusively.  When plotted as a function of the time available for it, the average lateral displacement started at a latency of about 1.5 seconds, reached its halfway point at 2.5 seconds and its maximum at somewhat less than 4 seconds.

and

On the basis of these and consistent earlier results from related experiments, it was recommended that, for safe operation, at least 3 seconds should be reserved for drivers to respond, by steering, to changes in the road environment.

It may be worth to noting that the AASTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) handbook 1973 states:

Whenever the driver is confronted with a complex or highway situation and is required to make choices, judgements, and decisions, his response time may increase to 2, 3 or even 5 seconds.

The Olson, Dewer and Forber book ‘Forensic Aspects of Driver Perception and Response’ provides an overview of the current PRT research and states;

In an emergency situation, in which the hazard is relatively conspicuous and first appears directly ahead or nearly so, available research suggests that most drivers will respond in about 1.5 to 2 seconds.

and

These are simple or straightforward situations. Many situations are complex and must be dealt with as such.

The time between the appearance of a hazard and the response can be sub-divided into the following stages:

Detection:       The detection interval starts when the hazard enters the driver’s field of view and ends when the driver has become aware that it is present. 

Identification: Having become aware of something the driver must next obtain sufficient information to decide what action, if any, must occur.

Decision:         After identifying there is a hazard the driver must decide what the appropriate action must be. 

Response:        At this stage the brain sends instructions to the necessary muscles to carry out the intended action.  The perception-response time ends when the action is completed, i.e. when the foot lands on the brake pedal.

The time to detect and identify the hazard is the largest variable and can be dependent upon its size, orientation, whether it is easy to identify, the contrast between it and its background, luminance levels, the colour of the object, the location and any sources of glare, such as oncoming lights from another vehicle, complexity of the junction, movement of other pedestrians and/or vehicles, etc.

Olson states:

In all likelihood, any individual engaged in the investigation of accidents at a professional level would agree that the events with which drivers are confronted vary greatly in their complexity.  If we can agree on that, it is difficult to understand why so many professional investigators seem willing to assume that PRT can be expressed as a single value.  The value quoted varies widely from one investigator to another in the experience of the authors, ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 seconds, and sometimes longer.  By far the most popular value seems to be 1.5 seconds.  One might argue with some apparent justification that they cannot all be correct, but depending on the situation under consideration, the PRT of a reasonably competent driver could be found anywhere within that range.

It should be appreciated that, because one driver may take a little longer to respond to a potential hazard than another driver, it does not mean that driver was not reacting in a reasonable time.

Therefore, investigators must be extremely careful when providing perception response times.  All aspects of the collision should be taken into account and, importantly, investigators should not suggest that one figure suits all circumstances.

Jim Keenan, Accident Investigator, Keith Borer Consultants

 

Subscribe To Mailing List

To unsubscribe click here

What our customers say...

  • Mr Cook completed the report very quickly and to a high standard, despite the very short timeframe in which he was given.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • I am really grateful for your assistance in this case; I am sure it made the pivotal difference.

    Solicitor – May 2019
  • As always, your firm goes out of its way to assist.  Together with the high standards of reports, it is why I have used your firm since the 1980’s.

    Solicitor – May 2018
  • John Tarpey's expert report was full and allowed me to present the material to the court effectively and allowed me, with his assistance, to effectively challenge the prosecution expert's assertions.

    Barrister – November 2018
  • Fast service; timely response to communication.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • We’ve had years of excellent service from you.

    Solicitor – August 2018
  • Fiona Taylor provided quick responses to all of my questions and queries. The service was very professional throughout, from my initial enquiry to receiving the Report.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • Clear communication, very good advice, good quality of forensic report.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • There are times when DNA evidence can be a little dry, but Mike Appleby's presentation and delivery to the jury was pitch perfect.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Mr Cook’s evidence was clear and concise and did not waiver under cross-examination.  His efforts in this case are greatly appreciated.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • Very quick response to both our initial email enquiry and all emails. Helpful and approachable staff and experts.

    Solicitor – August 2018
  • We have used your services for some time and are very satisfied.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Mr Armstrong was very professional and presented his analysis to the Jury in a very helpful way.

    Barrister – July 2019
  • Please thank Orla Sower for her excellent work on this case.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • Known to us as credible experts, who provide a first class service.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Clear information about cost, speed and efficiency of report.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Many thanks for your very helpful and professional report.

    Solicitor – June 2019
  • Simon Bunter is extraordinarily knowledgeable, remarkably efficient and a wonderful communicator. I cannot recommend him highly enough.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • The prosecutor found Dr Davey's report particularly well considered which undoubtedly informed his decision not to proceed with the case. Can I thank you very much for your help in this matter.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Have used you before and always found you efficient and easy to deal with.

    Solicitor – August 2018
  • Ultimately, the mere fact that we had instructed yourselves as experts and the difficulties the police had … in my view went some way towards convincing the CPS that they needed to review the case and ultimately discontinue it.

    Solicitor – April 2018
  • Superb outcome in the case ... as a direct result of Mr Prime discussing matters with his counterpart.  Very, very impressive.  Good, too, with the client.

    Counsel – April 2018
  • We have been using your services for a number of years and have always been very happy with the service provided.

    Solicitor - April 2019
  • Quick response to our request; friendly members of staff.

    Solicitor – September 2018
  • Easy to use BAC calculation form, fast turn around.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Please pass on my thanks to Emma Youngson for the speed at which she completed the report; I am very grateful.

    Solicitor - July 2019
  • Amazing!

    Counsel – July 2018
  • I am very impressed by your service.

    Solicitor, February 2020
  • Found the service to be extremely helpful, given the timeframe in which the report was required.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • We find you reliable and expeditious.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Please pass on my gratitude to Mr Marryat for being able to compile a report in such a quick turnaround. Much appreciated.

    Solicitor, August 2019
  • Exceptional service.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • Eager to assist at very short notice and very helpful on the phone.

    Solicitor – May 2019
  • Just a very high quality, professional service.

    Solicitor, December 2019
  • Instant reply on whether they can help or not; excellent with keeping us updated; fantastic report.

    Solicitor - April 2018
  • We were kept continually up to date about the progress of the report.

    Solicitor – May 2018
  • I would like to thank you both for all your help on this case, and the tasks you had to perform at short notice.  Your assistance was greatly appreciated.

    Solicitor - May 2019
  • I have previously attended a demonstration of the techniques used by the experts at Keith Borer Consultants.  What they can achieve is genuinely astonishing.  I require my instructing solicitor to immediately contact Keith Borer Consultants and seek out their assistance.

    Colin Buckle, Barrister – September 2018
  • Extremely quick and efficient.

    Solicitor – September 2018
  • We are very grateful to Mr Marryat for all the hard work he has done for us.

    Solicitor – June 2019
  • Thank you for writing the report so quickly. Very helpful.

    Solicitor – August 2018
  • The Evidence given by Mr Dunnill resulted in the trial of issue being found in the client's favour, thereby avoiding immediate custodial sentence.

    Barrister, August 2019
  • Mike Prime’s presentation on paper, in conferences and from the witness box was excellent on what is a very difficult and sad case.  My client’s family particularly wished to express their gratitude.  They found that he made “more sense than the prosecution expert”.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • I have instructed you for many years and always find yourselves to be helpful, efficient and reports are prepared in an easy to digest format.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • I instructed Mr Armstrong on a recommendation from another counsel and will certainly recommend him to my colleagues in future.

    Barrister – November 2018
  • Your service was exemplary.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • Mr Brown and the work he did were excellent in every respect.  We are grateful to him for his prompt and professional assistance.

    Solicitor – September 2018
  • Always a good service.

    Solicitor – September 2018
  • Based on many previous instructions to assist with our cases, the reports produced by your Experts are always helpful.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • Helen Davey’s report is excellent, as are all the reports that she has written for us.  She is always very willing to provide advice and answer questions and is also a very nice person.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • You provide a good service and work within the constraints of the LAA funding.

    Solicitor – April 2018
  • We have used KBC for many years: always helpful, plenty of experts & LAA seems to be happy with estimates for CRM4 application purposes.

    Solicitor - August 2019
  • Alan Henderson was a very knowledgeable witness, clearly very familiar with his subject matter and capable of explaining it too. I would not hesitate to use him in the future.

    Barrister, August 2019
  • We have used KBC for our forensic requirements for many years. The service has always been excellent, timely and useful.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • Always try to instruct, if possible, due to excellent service provided.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Efficient and very responsive.

    Solicitor - April 2019
  • Swift service.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • I cannot speak more highly of the quality of the report.  Mr Prime is now my ‘go to’ expert.

    Solicitor – September 2018
  • After the initial phone call, I knew I had contacted the right organisation.  The report just reaffirmed what I already knew.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • Prompt and efficient communication, met the deadline, carried out the instructions.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • Excellent service from Alan Henderson and his report assisted me in cross examining the Crown witness.

    Solicitor – May 2018
  • We were impressed by the quality of the report and competitive cost.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • Reasonably priced compared to other experts.

    Solicitor – May 2019
  • Mr Prime attended punctually on each day of this case.  He possesses a very approachable and helpful attitude.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • We were kept updated throughout the process and the report was provided promptly.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Quick and efficient; and well laid out report.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Jenny Gray was excellent and very helpful throughout.

    Barrister, November 2019
  • Excellent communication, timescales met despite difficulties with police & CPS.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • We have been instructing KBC for the last 20 years or so, and they are listed as our first choice on our database. I have never had any cause for complaint and the experts have always acted with integrity and professionalism.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • You guys are simply the best.

    Solicitor - September 2018
  • Richard Brown always provides accurate and impartial advice, which makes the advocate’s job so much easier when advising clients or presenting the case in court.

    Barrister – November 2018
  • Very quick turnaround, with attention to detail and helpful comments.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Excellent reputation.

    Solicitor – May 2018
  • Thank you for getting back to me so quickly. This is exactly what we needed.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Brilliant job and response to late and urgent instructions – very much above and beyond what we would expect.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • Thank you very much, again, for the professionalism of your expert witnesses.

    Barrister – November 2018
  • We are especially impressed by the Expert's willingness to discuss a case over the telephone before a formal instruction and the fast turnaround for completion of reports.

    Solicitors – June 2018
  • It is about professionalism, efficiency, attention to detail, courtesy and kindness.  It is a very, very long time since I have dealt with any group that was as quick to respond and as efficient as you all were.

    Private Client – April 2018
  • Always a pleasure working with you guys; our first choice for instruction.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Speed, efficiency and accuracy.

    Solicitor – June 2018
  • Alan Henderson was excellent.  Very knowledgeable on this area of law.  Provided an excellent report, with speed.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • Quality service, helpful staff, prompt reports.  Our company has used Keith Borer Consultants for many years.

    Solicitor - February 2019
  • Responsive, fast turnaround, quality reports, legal aid rates.

    Solicitor - April 2018
  • Quick response, easily contactable.  Never had to instruct expert for this type of report and you provided us with all the information to enable us to request the necessary consent from CPS etc.  Very helpful.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • Mr Farley was exceptionally good in the witness box and very robust under cross examination. I would not hesitate to instruct him again.

    Counsel – May 2018
  • The website had all the key words that I was looking to see for an expert in the area of interest.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • Jenny Gray acted with the utmost integrity throughout. This was noted in open court by the judge hearing the case.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • Simon Bunter is as good an expert as I have ever worked with.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Friendliness and complete empathy in what was a very stressful situation for me.

    Private client – September 2018
  • Your report is fantastic and much appreciated.

    Private client - April 2019
  • Attentive. Quick. Professional.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • Great communication and updates.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Please thank Sarah Morley for her sterling work.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • Very good.

    Counsel – May 2018
  • Extremely good customer service and continuous contact/support.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • It is always easy to contact KBC and to get a prompt reply.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Richard Brown is an excellent expert witness.

    Barrister – November 2018
  • Mr Cook’s report was easy to follow for those who are not experts in this field and explained the method and conclusion fully.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • Consistently reliable. Reports are very easy to read.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • I found the service to be very professional throughout.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • Dr Helen Davey was, as always, excellent. From her initial report to her attendance at a conference and court. Her expertise is apparent and her ability to explain difficult issues is outstanding.

    Counsel – August 2018
  • We have worked with you for a number of years and find your work accurate and reliable.

    Solicitor – April 2018
  • Have used many times previously and always been extremely satisfied with the service and reports.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • Easy to find on Google and seemed like decent, legitimate company at decent price.

    Private client - March 2019
  • We are very grateful to Mr Prime.  He made himself available at short notice and was contactable over the phone beforehand in order to clarify/confirm certain aspects of the case.

    Solicitor – May 2018
  • Reliable and trustworthy.

    Solicitor – August 2018
  • I can say that I am very satisfied with the service I have received from KBC, starting with my initial phone call and interaction your colleague when I made my initial enquiry, right up to the report being received. I would certainly use KBC again and would recommend you to my colleagues.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Adrian Armstrong is an excellent witness who easily out-shone the police expert.

    Barrister - November 2018
  • I found Mr Prime to be a very good natured and competent expert witness who presented well in the witness box.

    Barrister – July 2019
  • Report prepared well and is a format we could understand. Written in a way that the lay person can understand.

    Solicitor – June 2018
  • Outstanding.  Mr Prime was conscious of duty but compelling in his approach to the evidence.

    Counsel – April 2018
  • Mr Dampier made an incredibly complicated matter easy to understand.

    Barrister, February 2020
  • Service had a quick turnaround and any queries were quickly addressed.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Mike Appleby's exceptional quality was noted by all of the Counsel involved in the case. It is always a pleasure to watch someone, who is good at something, doing it and doing it well.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Very fast, professional, easy to instruct.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • We would be extremely grateful if you could thank Ms Gray again for her incredible report.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Richard Brown was excellent and his professional manner/quality of evidence won the day for us - compared with the prosecution expert! Quality counts!

    Solicitor - June 2018
  • The service was both timely and accurate - exactly what was required in a developing trial.

    Solicitor – November 2018
  • I have to thank you for all the help you have given me in preparing for this and in giving your evidence, which I think was very convincing and went a long way to this acquittal. 

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Thank you very, very much - impeccable service as per usual.

    Solicitor – April 2018
  • I was very grateful to your Mike Prime for assistance he gave me on a case recently when he went out of his way to assist, despite the fact a trial was imminent and it became clear I would not have the chance to formally instruct at that point. I thought that was very impressive.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • Mrs Allan gave extremely clear evidence.

    Barrister – July 2019
  • Quick, efficient and professional.

    Solicitor - February 2019
  • Extremely prompt service.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • You have always been excellent.

    Solicitor – May 2018
  • Prompt and reliable service.

    Solicitor – October 2018
  • Prompt provision of report and prompt reply to queries.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • I was delighted by Mrs Tweedy's professional and thorough approach.

    Mr Saltrese - September 2019
  • Easy to read report.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • Prompt attention to dealing with queries and providing information and reports.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • Mr Appleby was truly excellent. While giving evidence it was plain that he has achieved the perfect blend of clarity and authoritative charisma.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Prompt and efficient handling of initial enquiries and arrangements to inspect Prosecution exhibits.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Excellent reports within Legal Aid rates.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Efficient and helpful in a complex case.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • I found the quality of the report very high, and I am aware that Dr Davey had to work hard to hit the deadline because of other commitments.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • Both our client and I were very impressed by your expert evidence. I will be singing your praises for years to come.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Very thorough report.

    Solicitor – June 2018
  • I was very impressed both with the clarity of Dr Davey’s report to the layperson, and her even-handedness. The objective tone of the report and the fact that the opposing party’s expert agreed with the analysis gave Dr. Davey’s evidence a huge amount of credibility. I would recommend her to anyone in need of similar evidence and have no doubt that her evidence was vital to us winning the case.

    Diarmuid Laffan, Barrister - June 2019
  • Complete satisfaction with services.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Quick telephone answering, excellent understanding of the issues facing us i.e. prior authority, court dates changing at last moment, need for rapid responses.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Overall helpful and efficient service.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • We have used you many times before and have never been anything but entirely satisfied. We will continue to do so.

    Solicitor – June 2018
  • Thanks to Sarah Morley for her help: her evidence was very important in bringing this case to justice and it is greatly appreciated.

    Solicitor - August 2019
  • Great report - it really shows off your skills compared to the prosecution (so-called) experts. Thanks so much.

    Counsel - June 2018
  • No improvement needed.

    Solicitor – July 2018
  • Have used Keith Borer in the past for many different types of reports and would do so again.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Comprehensive and comprehendible expert’s report; first class response to queries.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Extremely efficient.

    Solicitor – August 2018
  • Thank you for your hard work in this case and for the prompt responses. 

    Barrister, March 2020
  • Used KBC for years; always found you efficient and helpful.

    Solicitor – May 2018
  • Helpful, speedy and good quality.

    Solicitor – May 2019

Keith Borer Consultants is a division of Orchid Cellmark Ltd, a company registered in England at 16 Blacklands Way, Abingdon, OX14 1DY.

Registered No. 4045527; VAT registration No. GB 750 0292 64

Website developed by Problue Solutions