Skip to main content
 
 
 

The Evidence that Never Was 2 - Evidence Not Collected

The Evidence that Never Was 2 - Evidence Not Collected

The Evidence that Never Was 2 - Evidence Not Collected

Continuing on a theme of Evidence that Never Was and our article on Evidence in Need of Balanced Evaluation, another area where cuts to forensic budgets are removing the ability of the CJS to deliver justice is where Evidence is Not Collected.  This is exemplified by the number of trials being brought without forensic evidence.  What's new there a cynic might ask? What's new is the increasing number of cases where the collection and straightforward (old school) analysis of physical evidence which could provide discrimination between two accounts of events is not being done, but which the absence thereof, by default, is condemning trials to fail to achieve the evidence threshold for safe conviction.  It cannot be good for justice that where scientific evidence would prove a case one way or the other, cases are being put to juries to decide as if on a beauty parade.  Furthermore the cost of taking cases to court for them to fail for lack of evidence must far outweigh the few hundreds of pounds' cost of analytical testing.

Case Examples:

A car driver was alleged to have been involved in a collision with a white van.  A police officer attending the driver's home noted white smears on the car, which he presumed were 'consistent' with the incident alleged.  The driver denied a collision with the van and asserted that the white smears were the result of an earlier collision with a different vehicle of a different make.   (The significance of this is that the paint on vehicles of apparently similar colour is likely to be analytically distinguishable between makes and models).

The case proceeded to court, but when the defence requested access to the 'evidence' it transpired that no samples of the white smears had been taken and the car was no longer available.  The case collapsed.   But it need not have got that far if the relevant paint samples had been taken and analysed and proved discriminating, or indeed, in the alternative outcome, matching analysis might have secured a guilty plea. 

In either scenario the cost to the public purse of doing the testing is likely to have been much less than getting to trial without it and much safer for the CJS than seeking a conviction on hope.

In another low-level case a man was accused of criminal damage (breaking a car window with his hand).  The defendant was arrested shortly after the incident on the say so of his former partner, although this conflicted with another witness statement.  There was no further substantive evidence but there could easily have been if on arrest the defendant's clothes had been searched for glass fragments.  Someone guilty of breaking a window with their hand would inevitably put themselves in close proximity to the breaking glass and the expectation of finding a large number of matching glass fragments would be high.  Again, 'old school' analysis would have been relatively low cost but very discriminating in this context.  The failure to take steps to recover what could be exculpatory evidence for analysis equally could be considered an abuse of process.

In a recent people-smuggling case, a lorry driver was accused with involvement in the plot - which he denied.  The prosecution evidence included a statement alleging that the driver had in his possession a key which opened the padlock on the trailer of the lorry.  But did it?  The driver denied his key was for the recovered lock and stated that this lock was not the lock he had put on to secure the trailer after picking up his load. 

On examination, we found that the lock and key were indeed of different make, but also that the lock had had part of its latch removed such that almost any key sized/shaped object (including a paper clip and the driver's key) would open it.  So yes, the Prosecution statement was correct in that the key the driver had in his possession did open the lock, but it was also dangerously incomplete.  On review, the 'evidence' that the driver had control over the security of the padlocked trailer was unsupportable and the case was dropped. 

These cases often revolve on one person's word against another's, or perhaps just one person's perception of an event or their subsequent association of 'evidence' with an event.  The fact that simple evidence gathering and evaluation at an early stage is not being done, we suggest, is a false economy both financially and to justice.

Dr Guy Cooper

 

Tweets by @KBCforensics 

Subscribe To Mailing List

To unsubscribe click here

What our customers say...

  • Helpfulness from always timely, pleasant and helpful first contact to conclusion of case.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • Service was excellent throughout.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Good service, prompt, efficient, have used many times in the past.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Value for money.

    Solicitor, May 2020
  • Mr Appleby’s DNA report and the way in which he broke complex issues down was very much appreciated and greatly assisted in my cross-examination. I would have no hesitation in seeking his expert guidance again in the future.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Speedy and detailed quotes which do not delay funding from LAA.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Would definitely use you again; very impressed.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Nigel Cook was incredibly thorough, professional and responded to my emails/questions very promptly.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Your (cell site) reports and maps were extremely helpful.

    Barrister, February 2021 ​​​​​​
  • Quick response with quote and report.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Ross Donnelly has been so helpful and professional at all times. We haven’t enough positive things to say about him.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • Quick and easy service. Clear and concise statement provided by the expert.

    Private instruction, September 2021
  • Speedy quotes and timely delivery of reports.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Prompt responses, excellent handwriting experts.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Always provide detailed quotes to assist with applying for authority from LAA. Quick response and good communication.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Excellent, as usual.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • I chose this company, as the first point of contact was extremely helpful.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • I have been instructing KBC for over 15 years and have always been happy with the service, contact from experts and quality of the reports.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Prompt and Professional and produces excellent reports.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Quick, expert and accurate.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Quick, efficient service and a well-prepared report.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Very impressed; would use again.

    Barrister, April 2021
  • Reliable, professional & very helpful. Helen Davey is a class act

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Telephone communications were very helpful when we were not able to contact the expert directly. The call takers were knowledgeable as to the case and what was required and answered any queries we had.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Quick, professional, friendly, comprehensive.

    Prison Governor, June 2020
  • Courteous and informative.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • I was able to have a meaningful conversation with a specialist when obtaining a quote for the work.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • Provided quotes quickly and complied with court timescales.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Mrs Allan was most informative and provided explanations where required. A very professional attitude.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • We have always received professional and high standards of services. Reports are produced promptly and communications responded to without delay.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Recently listened to a podcast of one of the experts and was impressed with content.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • Brilliant communication, my emails were promptly answered.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Many thanks for the report which is excellent.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Friendly, approachable, amenable, accommodating, professional.

    Instructing party, April 2021
  • Past experience has taught us that KBC is the go-to expert witness service.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • I don’t think the service could be improved upon or bettered in any way.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Exceptionally efficient service.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Mr Brown was very good, he explained all the relevant toxicology issues, which can be complicated, and also explained them to the Court.

    Solicitor, June 2021
  • I am impressed by the efficiency and quality of the computer forensic reports. You are always my first port of call.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Mr Prime was very good at court in explaining concepts to the jury and presenting his evidence. I would have no hesitation in using him again and recommending him to others.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Reliable and excellent communication to ensure that the work requested can be undertaken and processed efficiently.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Gregg Beatson was professional, knowledgeable and gave his opinion well.

    Counsel, June 2021
  • No question was too silly and everything was explained so clearly and easily; great customer service.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Regular contact, advice on hand via phone if necessary, prompt and efficient.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Clear advice given at start and very prompt response.

    Private Client, March 2021
  • Really happy with all aspects of this case and would definitely recommend this company. Thank you.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Easy access to experts; excellent communication and advice, as required.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • I have worked with Mr Donnelly in many cases over the years and his expertise, presentation of written work and ability in the witness box is second to none.

    Counsel, November 2020
  • Thank you very much once again for your excellent service.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Speedy responses to our instructions and questions asked. Helpful estimated timeframe for the service of reports.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Karl Ebejer was always prompt with responses and was very helpful.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Provided very comprehensive response to initial fire investigation enquiry, which guided what we needed.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Judge gave favourable comments on Dr Ash's balanced approach.

    Barrister, June 2021
  • Website was very informative.  First contact was knowledgeable and efficient. The report was delivered in record time - very impressed!

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Fast response and work turnover time; great customer service.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Communication and speed of delivery of information was, as always, excellent.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Simon Bunter was excellent in evidence and dealt with the cross examination very well. He was adept at handling the questions and was professional in his delivery. He was well prepared and thorough.

    Barrister, May 2021
  • A thorough analysis, with well set out conclusions.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Mr Frost has been a great help in this case and we really appreciate his assistance.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Mr Fagan was readily available to answer queries very promptly and worked to a tight time limit. He was also extremely helpful in trying circumstances surrounding a refusal by the prosecution to release exhibits.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • We have used your services on many previous occasions. You always provide the cheapest estimate and respond quicker than any other service provider we have contacted for the purposes of Legal Aid.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • Excellent DNA knowledge. Good turn around speed and communication.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • I find KBC invariably helpful and reliable.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Superlative quality of experts and understanding of the particular challenges facing solicitors’ firms.

    Solicitor, July 2021
  • I always choose you because of the fast, efficient and excellent work you do.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Extremely helpful, efficient and above all thoroughly professional.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Experts are always happy to discuss matters prior to providing report.

    Solicitor, December 2020
  • Easy to contact, quick responses (particularly in the current circumstances), very helpful staff.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Excellent client care and service.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • I chose KBC because it has a good reputation and the price is very fair.

    Private client, April 2021
  • Andrew Dampier provided first class service in the form of reports and maps. He was able to explain the report in good layman’s terms and was also available to take calls and provide further information to counsel.

    Barrister, January 2021
  • Swift and timely report – kept in touch throughout the process – happy to discuss the matter further over the phone.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • Good admin - chasing up correspondence. Quick preparation of report. Easy access to expert for clarification purposes.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Good communication, fast quote and service of drink drive report.

    Solicitor, May 2021
  • Very quick response to queries raised following receipt of report. Very helpful.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • My impression of your service was excellent.

    Private Instruction, November 2020
  • Thank you very much, I am grateful and impressed with your service.

    Solicitor, January 2021
  • I am extremely grateful to you for all your work on this case, in particular your prompt and helpful responses to my repeated requests.

    Barrister, February 2021
  • Mr Dunnill’s report was helpful and our conference at Court informative; I would certainly be happy to use him in a case again.

    Barrister, December 2020
  • We have used KBC on many occasions in the past and have always had a reliable service.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Very approachable.

    Solicitor, November 2020
  • Please pass on my thanks to Ross Donnelly for everything - top job!

    Counsel, July 2021
  • Report well presented. Concise and precise.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • There is no question that your input was instrumental in persuading the Defendants to alter their stance.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Mr Ebejer was always very professional and friendly.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Mrs Morley was very good and a strong defence witness.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • Our lawyer is most impressed with your report.

    Instructing party, Guyana, April 2021
  • Great communication, very informative and quick turnaround.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • I find your service prompt, efficient and helpful. Alan was particularly helpful and rang me to discuss issues. I was able to understand clearly what he was outlining and think he will be an asset to the defence case.

    Solicitor, April 2021
  • I was told you were the best at what you did. I honestly believe I got what was required.

    Private client, July 2020
  • Provided helpful information above and beyond what was expected.

    Solicitor, February 2021
  • Extremely efficient in all respects.

    Solicitor, August 2021
  • We have used your company numerous times and have always received very well written and easy to understand reports.

    Solicitor, March 2021
  • Knowledgeable, helpful and polite.

    Solicitor, June 2020

Keith Borer Consultants is a division of Orchid Cellmark Ltd, a company registered in England at 16 Blacklands Way, Abingdon, OX14 1DY.

Registered No. 4045527; VAT registration No. GB 750 0292 64

Website developed by Problue Solutions