Skip to main content
 
 
 

Does The Evidence Speak For Itself? – Not Unless It Is Investigated

Does The Evidence Speak For Itself? – Not Unless It Is Investigated

Steve Guest, computer forensic expert, talks about the importance of investigating digital evidence and considering it in context

In the world of medicine, a good physician will generally use initial test results as a starting point for diagnosis. They will use their experience to interpret those results in the context of the medical history, lifestyle and environment of the patient and will move on to further examination and questioning of the patient. They will probably order further tests prior to forming their diagnosis, and only then will they devise an effective plan of treatment.

An effective detective will assess the initial evidence and then establish what further enquiries are necessary, often hitting “dead ends”, but will continue until, hopefully, all the relevant evidence that can be obtained has been obtained.

In neither case would it be considered appropriate to simply accept the initial findings and call an end to the matter.

The same principle is true in most areas of forensic practice. Bare physical or electronic evidence may appear to a layperson, using “common sense”, to be incontrovertible, particularly if it is presented as simple fact. Science is not like that. Things are not necessarily as they appear and establishing the context of an artefact may be every bit as important as locating the evidence itself.

The examples in this article are drawn from Computer Forensics - because I am writing it and that is the field in which I specialise! If you view the “News” section of the Keith Borer Consultants’ website, you will find many further illustrations from fields as diverse as (but not limited to) fingerprints, biology, toxicology, chemistry and fire investigation.

A trained technician may be competent in locating material of potential evidential significance, but that is only the starting point. It is at this juncture that the investigation of the recovered material should begin.

An even moderately used computer will contain a very large quantity of individual items of data – some of those items will be immediately apparent as comprising potential evidence, others may be placed in reserve. The term “placed in reserve” as opposed to “discarded” is highly relevant. These may become of great value in the long run.

Once the obvious evidence has been identified it may be possible to build a basic framework of the events that led to the presence of the core evidential material. It is, however, sometimes the case that by exploring of the “nooks and crannies” of the evidence a very accurate picture showing the way material has been created, manipulated, or accessed on a computer can be established, and, in particular, whether there is any evidence of user knowledge or intent.

A significant proportion of the prosecution reports that we see cease at the stage of the identification of evidence, a greater proportion address a basic framework, and very few provide the full and accurate picture of events. It is fully recognised that prosecution examiners are often working under great pressure and with limited resources, but that is of scant consolation to a client for whom a solid defence would be available if a case had been fully investigated.

A significant proportion of our work is in regard to indecent images of children or extreme pornography, but also extends to investigations of social media communications, email, electronic document analysis, alleged terrorist materials or improper disclosure of sensitive commercial data – in fact, anything relating to potential evidence on a PC or Mac computer (computing) or on mobile telephones, tablets, or other small electronic devices (mobile investigations).

Case Study: The investigative nature of our work is demonstrated in a recent case of a rather unusual nature. The client was charged with the possession of a very small number of Prohibited Images of a Child and the importation from China of an obscene article, alleged to comprise a “Child Sex Doll”. Our initial instruction related only to the image content, which was found to be questionable both in relation to whether the images could be confidently assessed as representing children, and on the accessibility of the images within a web browser cache. During the analysis of the Internet History, however, Internet activity relating to sex dolls and a possible alternative interpretation of the evidence was identified.

The main thrust of the prosecution case was the size of the doll, 100cm tall. There was no argument as to whether the item had been imported (though it had been intercepted by the authorities). Examination of the client’s computer identified searches for sex dolls, and the ordering of, and payment for, such an item. None of the searches related in any way to the seeking of a doll that in any way had the characteristics of a child. Following consultation with the instructing solicitor, the website from which the doll had been ordered was visited. It was found that, whilst potentially unlawful items were available on the site, none of those pages had been visited by the client. The pages that were visited featured dolls with exaggerated adult female characteristics, available in a number of sizes, presumably for the purposes of portability. The case was withdrawn.

In this case, evidence was located that exonerated the client of the charges. The evidence was found because the case was treated as an investigation, and not simply as an exercise in the repetition of work done by the prosecution examiner. It should be clearly stated, though, that when potential further avenues of investigation beyond the original instructions are identified, these will only be further pursued following consultation with the instructing party.

The Role of an Investigator

Historically, prosecution computer examinations were undertaken by experienced criminal investigators who had subsequently been trained in computer technology. Now, in many cases, examinations are performed by technicians who tend to be highly competent in the extraction of evidence but may lack the investigative experience and background knowledge of the relevant legislation and case law to fully interpret the extracted material, or to identify further avenues of inquiry.

The findings, in the form of a brief SFR, will be passed to an officer who may have significant investigative experience and an understanding of the legislation, but may lack the facility to fully appreciate the relevance of technical issues of the report presented.

The case will then be submitted to a prosecutor, who will have a detailed knowledge of legislation and case law, may be in a position to suggest further avenues of investigation but, again, may not be fully “up to speed” on the technical issues involved.

Each of these three individuals are likely to be highly competent in their own field, and no criticism of them is implied, but it becomes apparent how potentially unsound cases can find their way to Court.

Keith Borer Consultants brings together technical and investigative expertise with the experience to interpret our findings having cognizance of the relevant legislation. Furthermore: we work as a team, both during an investigation and, through our peer review process, in identifying any stone that may have lain unturned during an examination – and causing that stone to be turned.

Steve Guest, Forensic Computer Expert

Subscribe To Mailing List

To unsubscribe click here

What our customers say...

  • Easy to find on Google and seemed like decent, legitimate company at decent price.

    Private client - March 2019
  • I have had the pleasure of the assistance of Mike Appleby on a number of occasions now and he is an excellent man to have around. 

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Mr Armstrong impressed throughout the trial as a real expert in his field. It was apparent too that Mr Armstrong was entirely impartial.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Consistently reliable. Reports are very easy to read.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • I have instructed you for many years and always find yourselves to be helpful, efficient and reports are prepared in an easy to digest format.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • I was told you were the best at what you did. I honestly believe I got what was required.

    Private client, July 2020
  • Eager to assist at very short notice and very helpful on the phone.

    Solicitor – May 2019
  • Complete satisfaction with services.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Communication and speed of delivery of information was, as always, excellent.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • There are times when DNA evidence can be a little dry, but Mike Appleby's presentation and delivery to the jury was pitch perfect.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Mr Dampier made an incredibly complicated matter easy to understand.

    Barrister, February 2020
  • Efficient and helpful in a complex case.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Alan Henderson was a very knowledgeable witness, clearly very familiar with his subject matter and capable of explaining it too. I would not hesitate to use him in the future.

    Barrister, August 2019
  • Jenny Gray was excellent and very helpful throughout.

    Barrister, November 2019
  • The Evidence given by Mr Dunnill resulted in the trial of issue being found in the client's favour, thereby avoiding immediate custodial sentence.

    Barrister, August 2019
  • Very quick turnaround, with attention to detail and helpful comments.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Excellent, as usual.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Known to us as credible experts, who provide a first class service.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • We have been using your services for a number of years and have always been very happy with the service provided.

    Solicitor - April 2019
  • Quick, efficient service and a well-prepared report.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Service had a quick turnaround and any queries were quickly addressed.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Please pass on my gratitude to Mr Marryat for being able to compile a report in such a quick turnaround. Much appreciated.

    Solicitor, August 2019
  • Just a very high quality, professional service.

    Solicitor, December 2019
  • Prompt and Professional and produces excellent reports.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • I was very impressed both with the clarity of Dr Davey’s report to the layperson, and her even-handedness. The objective tone of the report and the fact that the opposing party’s expert agreed with the analysis gave Dr. Davey’s evidence a huge amount of credibility. I would recommend her to anyone in need of similar evidence and have no doubt that her evidence was vital to us winning the case.

    Diarmuid Laffan, Barrister - June 2019
  • Prompt provision of report and prompt reply to queries.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • I chose this company, as the first point of contact was extremely helpful.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • I have to thank you for all the help you have given me in preparing for this and in giving your evidence, which I think was very convincing and went a long way to this acquittal. 

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • I was delighted by Mrs Tweedy's professional and thorough approach.

    Mr Saltrese - September 2019
  • Your service was exemplary.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • I was able to have a meaningful conversation with a specialist when obtaining a quote for the work.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • Quick telephone answering, excellent understanding of the issues facing us i.e. prior authority, court dates changing at last moment, need for rapid responses.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Easy to use BAC calculation form, fast turn around.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Both our client and I were very impressed by your expert evidence. I will be singing your praises for years to come.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Your report is fantastic and much appreciated.

    Private client - April 2019
  • Brilliant communication, my emails were promptly answered.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • Extremely prompt service.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Prompt attention to dealing with queries and providing information and reports.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • We would be extremely grateful if you could thank Ms Gray again for her incredible report.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Mike Appleby's exceptional quality was noted by all of the Counsel involved in the case. It is always a pleasure to watch someone, who is good at something, doing it and doing it well.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Clear information about cost, speed and efficiency of report.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • A thorough analysis, with well set out conclusions.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Thank you for your hard work in this case and for the prompt responses. 

    Barrister, March 2020
  • Extremely good customer service and continuous contact/support.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • I found the quality of the report very high, and I am aware that Dr Davey had to work hard to hit the deadline because of other commitments.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • Thanks to Sarah Morley for her help: her evidence was very important in bringing this case to justice and it is greatly appreciated.

    Solicitor - August 2019
  • Karl Ebejer was always prompt with responses and was very helpful.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Please pass on my thanks to Emma Youngson for the speed at which she completed the report; I am very grateful.

    Solicitor - July 2019
  • We have been instructing KBC for the last 20 years or so, and they are listed as our first choice on our database. I have never had any cause for complaint and the experts have always acted with integrity and professionalism.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • I am very impressed by your service.

    Solicitor, February 2020
  • Mr Prime reported to us with great efficiency and presented his evidence to the Jury in an extremely persuasive manner.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Service was excellent throughout.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Mr Appleby was truly excellent. While giving evidence it was plain that he has achieved the perfect blend of clarity and authoritative charisma.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • There is no question that your input was instrumental in persuading the Defendants to alter their stance.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Prompt and efficient handling of initial enquiries and arrangements to inspect Prosecution exhibits.

    Solicitor - March 2019
  • Many thanks for your very helpful and professional report.

    Solicitor – June 2019
  • I will definitely use Dr Schudel in the future and will be recommending him to my colleagues.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Swift service.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • I found the service to be very professional throughout.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • We have always received professional and high standards of services. Reports are produced promptly and communications responded to without delay.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Knowledgeable, helpful and polite.

    Solicitor, June 2020
  • I can say that I am very satisfied with the service I have received from KBC, starting with my initial phone call and interaction your colleague when I made my initial enquiry, right up to the report being received. I would certainly use KBC again and would recommend you to my colleagues.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • It is always easy to contact KBC and to get a prompt reply.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Simon Bunter is as good an expert as I have ever worked with.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Mr Armstrong was very professional and presented his analysis to the Jury in a very helpful way.

    Barrister – July 2019
  • Clear communication, very good advice, good quality of forensic report.

    Solicitor – January 2019
  • Helpful, speedy and good quality.

    Solicitor – May 2019
  • Telephone communications were very helpful when we were not able to contact the expert directly. The call takers were knowledgeable as to the case and what was required and answered any queries we had.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Good service, prompt, efficient, have used many times in the past.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Mrs Allan gave extremely clear evidence.

    Barrister – July 2019
  • Value for money.

    Solicitor, May 2020
  • Really happy with all aspects of this case and would definitely recommend this company. Thank you.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • We have used your services for some time and are very satisfied.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Easy access to experts; excellent communication and advice, as required.

    Solicitor, September 2020
  • Quick and efficient; and well laid out report.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Thank you for getting back to me so quickly. This is exactly what we needed.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Have used Keith Borer in the past for many different types of reports and would do so again.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Quick, professional, friendly, comprehensive.

    Prison Governor, June 2020
  • No question was too silly and everything was explained so clearly and easily; great customer service.

    Private instruction, September 2020
  • We have used KBC for many years: always helpful, plenty of experts & LAA seems to be happy with estimates for CRM4 application purposes.

    Solicitor - August 2019
  • I found Mr Prime to be a very good natured and competent expert witness who presented well in the witness box.

    Barrister – July 2019
  • Excellent reports within Legal Aid rates.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Easy to contact, quick responses (particularly in the current circumstances), very helpful staff.

    Solicitor, April 2020
  • Reasonably priced compared to other experts.

    Solicitor – May 2019
  • Always a pleasure working with you guys; our first choice for instruction.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • Comprehensive and comprehendible expert’s report; first class response to queries.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • The prosecutor found Dr Davey's report particularly well considered which undoubtedly informed his decision not to proceed with the case. Can I thank you very much for your help in this matter.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • I would like to thank you both for all your help on this case, and the tasks you had to perform at short notice.  Your assistance was greatly appreciated.

    Solicitor - May 2019
  • I am really grateful for your assistance in this case; I am sure it made the pivotal difference.

    Solicitor – May 2019
  • We were kept updated throughout the process and the report was provided promptly.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Quick, expert and accurate.

    Solicitor, July 2020
  • Mr Beatson was very helpful and professional, clearly with a wide range of knowledge and understanding.

    Solicitor, March 2020
  • Great communication and updates.

    Solicitor – December 2018
  • Regular contact, advice on hand via phone if necessary, prompt and efficient.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Mr Ebejer was always very professional and friendly.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Quality service, helpful staff, prompt reports.  Our company has used Keith Borer Consultants for many years.

    Solicitor - February 2019
  • Found the service to be extremely helpful, given the timeframe in which the report was required.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Jenny Gray acted with the utmost integrity throughout. This was noted in open court by the judge hearing the case.

    Solicitor, October 2019
  • Mr Brown was an impressive witness. As far as I am concerned, you can give him full marks all round.

    Counsel, March 2020
  • Quick, efficient and professional.

    Solicitor - February 2019
  • Very fast, professional, easy to instruct.

    Solicitor, November 2019
  • We are very grateful to Mr Marryat for all the hard work he has done for us.

    Solicitor – June 2019
  • Efficient and very responsive.

    Solicitor - April 2019
  • We find you reliable and expeditious.

    Solicitor – July 2019
  • Overall helpful and efficient service.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • Fast service; timely response to communication.

    Solicitor, January 2020
  • Excellent client care and service.

    Solicitor, August 2020
  • Simon Bunter is extraordinarily knowledgeable, remarkably efficient and a wonderful communicator. I cannot recommend him highly enough.

    Barrister, December 2019
  • Always try to instruct, if possible, due to excellent service provided.

    Solicitor, September 2019
  • We have used KBC on many occasions in the past and have always had a reliable service.

    Solicitor, April 2020

Keith Borer Consultants is a division of Orchid Cellmark Ltd, a company registered in England at 16 Blacklands Way, Abingdon, OX14 1DY.

Registered No. 4045527; VAT registration No. GB 750 0292 64

Website developed by Problue Solutions